จับตามอง สงคราม"นิวเคลียร์" โรงงานพลังงาน "นิวเคลียร์" การรั่วไหลของกัมมันตรังสี

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5O5CH5g4_A"]NATO Commander backs up Ron Paul on Foreign Policy! - YouTube[/ame]

สรุปย่อๆ

เค้าบอกว่าเราเรียนรู้จากประสบการณ์ว่า เราสามารถส่งทหารไปในตะวันออกกลาง และโซเวียตจะไม่มาหยุดพวกเรา และเรามีเวลา 5-10 ปีทำลายรัฐบาลของ 7 ประเทศ ซึ่งเป็น client ของโซเวียต ดังนี้ อีรัค --> ซีเรีย --> เลบานอน --> ลิเบีย ---> โซมาเลีย --> ซูดาน ---> อิหร่าน ก่อนที่จะมีมหาอำนาจใหม่ตั้งตัวขึ้นมา ให้ทำให้ประเทศพวกนี้วุ่นวาย และอยู่ในบังคับของเรา

เราประสบความล้มเหลวในอีรัค เพราะว่าอิหร่านและซีเรีย รู้แผนของเรา

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7zwWqMPqkU"]Congressman Ron Paul, MD - We've Been NeoConned - YouTube[/ame] NATO Commander backs up Ron Paul on Foreign Policy! CNN National Security Debate November 22, 2011

 

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wm0dM7EkCTY"]WORLD WAR 3 SET UP BY THE ELITES - YouTube[/ame]

 

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sojq8q4uTyY]NATO Prepares Global War -- Russian and Chinese Military on Highest Alert. (WW3) - YouTube[/ame]

 

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRGKsh_-zKs]CIA Secret Wars Killed 6 Million People Government Coverup Attacks on 3rd World Nations Third World - YouTube[/ame]

 

Obama & Hillary preparing for war with Syria.

• Add a comment

Kyle Rogers

, Charleston Political Buzz Examiner
November 25, 2011

Continue reading on Examiner.com Obama & Hillary preparing for war with Syria. - Charleston Political Buzz | Examiner.com Obama & Hillary preparing for war with Syria. - Charleston Political Buzz | Examiner.com


​

There is no "brutal crackdown on anti-government protesters" in Syria as our left-wing media cries over and over. These are not "anti-government protesters." These are violent, murderous, hard-line Sunni Muslims seeking to install a theocratic government. At the center of the uprising is the radical Muslim Brotherhood. They are being backed by the United States, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey. Many are heavily armed. They have even used rocket propelled grenades in attacks. Many are attacking religious minorities.


The Credo of the Islamic Brotherhood is "God is our objective; the Quran is our constitution, the Prophet is our leader; Jihad is our way; and death for the sake of God is the highest of our aspirations." The group believes in imposing Shari-ah law and opposes rights for women. This is the same group Obama and Hillary supported in Egypt. Of course Obama and Hillary backed even worse groups in Libya.


Obama appears to be postponing a possible strike on Iran to attack Syria first. Obama just moved a US aircraft carrier, George H.W. Bush, away from Iran and parked it in front of Syria. The aircraft carrier had been parked in the Straits of Hormuz. It had been standing ready for a possible strike against Iran. The US is engaged in so many undeclared wars that we are essentially out of carriers.



Advertisement

The United States is taking actions against Syria that mimics what happened immediately before Obama launched an undeclared war against Libya. Obama and Hillary are lobbying the UN for a Syrian "no fly zone." Even though there is no evidence that the Syrian government has even used any military aircraft against rebel militants.


A UN no-fly zone was immediately used as an excuse to go to war against Libya. Everyone knows that any UN resolution passed against Syria will be used as an excuse for war.



Obama did not even consult with congress, much less get a declaration of war, before attacking Libya. It is doubtful he will bother to consult with congress on Syria either.


The US ambassador to Syria, Robert Ford, left the country a month ago. He was actively encouraging militants to rebel against the Syrian government. Hillary recently made a public statement hinting that the US is funding the militants. She assured reporters that the militants were "well funded." Lebanon is accusing the CIA of actively sponsoring and promoting unrest in Syria.


Obama and Hillary are supporting the same radical Sunni militants in Syria, like the Muslim Brotherhood, that they did in Egypt and Libya. Hillary Clinton and the left-wing media would like you to believe that the anti-government forces are peace-loving democracy advocates. They are actually heavily armed thugs who seek a Saudi style theocratic dictatorship.
​
Syria is currently controlled by the Syrian Ba'ath party. This is a secular Arab nationalist party. It is supported by Syria's Christian and Shi'a minorities who call the Obama/Hillary back "activists" a "Sunni Lynch Mob." These same "activists" have been murdering Christians in the streets of Egypt since Obama & Hillary helped them gain power in that country.


Multitudes of weapons are being smuggled into Syria to arm the Muslim Brotherhood. The Syria government is accusing Saudi Arabia, and Israel of sending weapons into the country.



However, many of the weapons may simply be coming from black market opportunists.


Saudi Arabia supports the rebels in Syria, because Saudi Arabia is a hard-line Theocratic dictatorship itself. In fact, it is probably one of the most repressive dictatorships in the world. Woman are treated like slaves and forced to cover all but their face. Recently the Saudi government even ordered a crackdown on makeup.


Despite being a repressive dictatorship, Saudi Arabia is the US governments second most favorite regional power after Israel. It really shows what a total fraud people like Obama, Hillary, and Republican neo-cons really are.


Israel appears to be cheering for the militants in Syria as well. They seem to believe that a new regime in Syria will be good for Israel. Currently Syria sponsors the Lebanese Shi'a militia Hezbollah. They are also allies with Iran. Saudi Arabia is bitter enemies with Iran. It is illegal to support Hezbollah in Saudi Arabia, because they are Shi'a.


However, if Israeli thinks the Muslim Brotherhood will make a better neighbor, they are extremely short sighted. Egypt is already reversing the peace process with Israel since Obama and Hillary started backing the Muslim Brotherhood there.


In the past year Israel has shattered their relationship with the Turks. A 550 year Turkish-Jewish friendship, that began with the fall of Constantinople, appears to be over. Israel arrogance is to blame. Turkey was Israel's second most important ally after the United States. They were Israel's only regional military ally and Israel's only regional Muslim ally.



Turkey was also important because the Arabs are all still secretly afraid of the Turks. Turkey probably has a much better army than any Arab nation as well.


Israeli ruined that relationship with their attack on a Turkish ship delivering aid to the West Bank. Rather than try to make amends, Israel stands by their decision to attack the ship and refuses to offer an apology. Israel's "floatilla attack" will probably go down in history as the stupidist thing they ever did.


If Obama pulls the trigger on Syria, it will not be contained in Syria. It is already outside of Syria. Turkey is harboring 15,000 Sunni militants who call themselves the Syrian Free Army. Some of them are AWOL Syrian military. They have already claimed responsibility for the killing of nine Syrian soldiers. Hezbollah, the Shi'a militia, has mobilized in Lebanon along the border to stop arms smuggling. Syria and Iran both have armed Hezbollah. They would likely greenlight the use of heavy firepower by Hezbollah against Israel in the event of an attack on Syria or Iran.


In fact, Turkey is even warning of a regional Sunni vs. Shia war that could be triggered by an attack on Syria. A conflict that could easily severe Iraq into three separate nations.



Turkey says it may have to invade Syria itself to "create a buffer."


Meanwhile Russia has declared that the US has gone to far in the Middle East and vowed to continue shipping weapons to Syria.


We could very well see a large scale regional war involving Turkey, Lebanon, Israel, Syria, Iraq, Iran, and Saudi Arabia. If Palestine is granted statehood while all this is going on, it could be even worse.


The resulting worldwide economic problems would be devastating. The pentagon recently published a report that Iran could make good on it's promise to shut down the Straits of Hormuz. The Pentagon believes it would take thirty days to make the Straits safe for commercial traffic again. This means a full one third of the oil supply for the entire world would not make it to the market place. The resulting surge in gas prices would cripple economies all over the world. The United States would be blamed for causing this nightmare.


By the way, Obama and Hillary are also calling for regime change in Bahrain. However, any claim that they are bringing democracy will be bogus. They are letting the opprosive dictatorship in Saudi Arabia help pick the new regime.

Continue reading on Examiner.com Obama & Hillary preparing for war with Syria. - Charleston Political Buzz | Examiner.com Obama & Hillary preparing for war with Syria. - Charleston Political Buzz | Examiner.com

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pz8jil1qIuQ"]Nuke carrier leads US strike force into Syria waters - YouTube[/ame]
​

 

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ts59yTHeraQ]Dr. Nick Begich: HAARP, Secret Sciences & High Tech Mind Control 1/5 - YouTube[/ame]

 

Nato helicopter strike kills 25 Pakistani soldiers at Afghan border post

Pakistan has condemned an "unprovoked and indiscriminate" attack on its territory and immediately blockaded Nato supplies to Afghanistan after blaming coalition helicopters for killing up to 28 soldiers at a Pakistani border post.












Paramilitary forces patrol the streets of Peshawar, in northwest Pakistan November 26, 2011 Photo: Reuters

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...Pakistani-soldiers-at-Afghan-border-post.html

 

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCH7A_sCTKc]START WWIII, 3 NUKES STOLEN & AMERICA ATTACKS PAKISTAN David Chase Taylor from Truther.org - YouTube[/ame]

 

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNnf82earcM]NATO Strike Revenge For Pakistan Crackdown On CIA Assets 11/26/2011 - YouTube[/ame]

 

Reports Say Russian Ships In Syrian Waters Delivered Advanced Anti-Aircraft Missile System And Technicians

November 27, 2011 By T Kelly Leave a Comment
The Russian warships that arrived in Syrian territorial waters in recent days were reportedly carrying technical advisors who will assist the Syrian government in setting up an array of the super-advanced S-300 missiles.
This is according to Syrian and Russian sources cited by the London-based Arabic Al Quds-Al Arabi which said that Moscow is seeing a Western attack on Syria as a “red line” which it will not tolerate in any way.
This comes as the United States is moving the USS George H. W. Bush aircraft carrier off the coast of Syria and the Arab League has reportedly drawn up a plan for a no-fly zone over Syria which would utilize American logistical support.
The report said that Russia is maintaining their support for the Assad government in Syria, despite constantly growing Western pressure and amongst the puppet leaders that make up the Arab League.
In addition to the S-300 missiles, the report states that Russia is also installing advanced radar systems in all of the critical Syrian industrial and military installations.
Arutz Sheva reports that the S-300 system is regarded as one of the most powerful anti-aircraft missiles systems available.
They also point out that the radar system is capable of tracking 100 targets simultaneously while engaging up to 12 separate targets.
Deployment of the S-300 takes a mere five minutes and have a long life span with no maintenance required.
The system will provide coverage of areas both north and south of Syria which would be able to detect troop or aircraft movements towards Syrian borders.
The long-rage surface-to-air missiles were developed by Russia in 1960s-1970s in order to protect industrial and military bases from aircraft attacks and cruise missiles.
This S-300 system will reportedly be used to “deflect a possible attack by NATO or the U.S. and EU,” although the possibility of an Arab League-sponsored attack is considerable if recent reports are to be believed.
This system can reportedly target much of Israel and the Turkish Incirlik military base which is utilized by NATO, which would likely be leveraged if a no-fly zone operation was conducted.
The report claims that Russia was planning to sell the S-300 system to Iran but backed down after American and Israeli pressure.
However, the report also claims that Iran paid for the system for Syria and Arutz Sheva alleges, “It is not known if some of the missiles have reached Iran as well,” although that statement should obviously be taken with a large grain of salt.
The stakes have been raised considerably as of late with the U.S. Embassy in Damascus urging all American citizens to “immediately” leave Syria and the Turkish ministry telling Turkish pilgrims to avoid traveling through Syria altogether.
Furthermore, the French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe said that “humanitarian corridors or humanitarian zones” could be established in order to protect those supposedly under attack, according to the Financial Times.
Juppe said that the issue would be further discussed by Foreign Ministers of European Union member nations when they meet next month, although it appears that preparations for such an operation are already being made.
Juppe claimed that full-scale military intervention was not on the table although his other statements indicate otherwise.
“In response to a demand from the Syrian national council, we will examine, notably with our EU partners, the possibility of launching humanitarian initiatives to alleviate the considerable suffering of the (Syrian) population,” Juppe said.
Of course, as we have seen in Libya, any “humanitarian initiatives” that establish “humanitarian corridors or humanitarian zones” indeed require a full-scale military intervention that will undoubtedly leave countless civilians dead.
Even more importantly, any intervention whatsoever will spark the ire of the Russians and Iranians, likely causing a much larger conflict.
One might argue that this has been the plan all along, to first enter Syria under humanitarian pretenses which would, as I have previously covered, cause the Iranians to strike back and thus give justification to the Western nations that have been pushing for an attack on Iran.
If Iran attempts to help Assad defend himself against a foreign invasion, Israel would no longer need the smoking gun justification to launch an all-out assault on Iran and the United States would likely follow.
This is truly a hellish scenario, given that Russia would come to the side of Syria and Iran, likely drawing in China, which has been goaded recently by the United States in the South China Sea dispute.
I truly hope that all of this is a bunch of hype and that nothing will happen, as if this does unfold in the manner in which it is currently, the world will enter a new age of horrific war that will make previous world wars pale in comparison.

Source: http://www.activistpost.com/2011/11/reports-say-russian-ships-in-syrian.html

 

Clinton to Make Historic Visit to Burma Next Month

<hr class="hr_dot"> By BEN FELLER/ AP WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT Friday, November 18, 2011

<hr class="float_clear hr_dot"> <ins style="display:inline-table;border:none;height:60px;margin:0;padding:0;position:relative;visibility:visible;width:468px"><ins id="aswift_0_anchor" style="display:block;border:none;height:60px;margin:0;padding:0;position:relative;visibility:visible;width:468px"></ins></ins> <hr class="hr_dot">
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton greets in the traditional Thai way as she visits the collective centre for people evacuated from flooded areas in Bangkok on Nov.17. (Photo: Reuters)

<table cellpadding="1.8"> <tbody><tr> <td> [SIZE=-2]COMMENTS (16)[/SIZE]</td> </tr> <tr> <td> [SIZE=-2]RECOMMEND (63)[/SIZE]</td> </tr> <tr> </tr><tr> <td> [SIZE=-2]FACEBOOK[/SIZE] </td> </tr> <tr> <td> [SIZE=-2]TWITTER[/SIZE] </td> </tr> <tr><td> [SIZE=-2]PLUSONE[/SIZE] </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> [SIZE=-2]MORE[/SIZE] </td> </tr> <tr><td> [SIZE=-2]E-MAIL[/SIZE]</td> </tr> <tr> <td> [SIZE=-2]PRINT[/SIZE]</td> </tr> <tr> <td> [SIZE=-2]TEXT SIZE[/SIZE]
</td> </tr> </tbody></table>
BALI, Indonesia — In a breakthrough with a nation long shunned and sanctioned by the United States, President Barack Obama is sending Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton to Burma next month, making her the first official in her position to visit that repressed country in more than 50 years.
Obama was to announce the news on Friday during his diplomatic mission to Southeast Asia, a senior administration official told The Associated Press.
In deepening his engagement with Burma, the president first sought assurances from democracy leader and Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi. She spent 15 years under house arrest by the nation's former military dictators but is now in talking with the new civilian government about reforming the country.
Obama and Suu Kyi spoke by phone Thursday night.
The administration sees Clinton's visit as a sign of success for Obama's Burma policy, which was outlined in 2009 and focused on punishments and incentives to get the country's former military rulers to improve dire human rights conditions. The U.S. imposed new sanctions on Burma but made clear it was open to better relations if the situation changed.
Still, U.S. Officials emphasized that Obama has deep concerns about Burma's human rights record, treatment of ethnic minorities and closed nature of its society. Clinton's mission is to explore what the United States can do to support progress on political reform, individual rights and national reconciliation, the official said.
Burma, a former breadbasket of Southeast Asia, suffered not just repressive government but poor economic management during nearly 50 years of military rule.
It is subject to wide-ranging trade, economic and political sanctions from the US and other Western nations, enforced in response to brutal crackdowns on pro-democracy protesters in 1988 and 2007 and its refusal to hand power to pro-democracy leader Suu Kyi's party after the 1990 elections.
Now Burma's nominally civilian government, which took power in March, has declared its intention to liberalize the hard-line policies of the junta that preceded it.
It has taken some fledgling steps, such as easing censorship, legalizing labor unions, suspending an unpopular, China-backed dam project and working with Suu Kyi.
Obama will see Burma's president, Thein Sein, on Friday during a summit of Southeast Asian nations.

Clinton to Make Historic Visit to Burma Next Month